Pixel Induced

"No Borders Nor Boundaries" - Where Photographers get together

Photocritique

Information

Have your photos assessed here in this forum.

1. Start a new discussion.

2. Put in you dialog and questions.

3. Select the picture icon next to the box with the blue "Link" in it.

Members: 47
Latest Activity: Feb 25

rules for group.

The rules for this group will be ongoing.

1. Please take the time to thank for someone's help.

2. Involvement is crucial to the success of the group so please try to give some opinions about the photos on here.

3. Be courteous about what you say and try to use some tact. Criticism is a hard thing to take sometimes.

4. Try to give some feedback with your response. If you found it a great image it would be helpful to say why.

5. Please allow 3 days for a review. Sometimes people have busy Lives.

Thanks.

6. Please try to keep your images small and for a size I have 300 pixels by 450 pixels or 100 kb for size or a maximum of 700 pixels by 1050 pixels or 500 kb in size. If you make the image too large some people without Broadband will have difficulty downloading and seeing the image your want reviewed. Also if someone wants to steal your image you will make it easier if your image is too large. Thank you.

7. Please post you images in a discussion and ask what you are looking for. Thank you.

Discussion Forum

What do I do

I was walking in the bush when I got this pic. I had my 300mm lens on my camera I was looking for some Birds when I saw this ant he was to close for the 300mm lens with a flash and this is what I got. Some advice on what to do next…Continue

Started by Warren Causer Feb 25.

Correct White balance 2 Replies

I set white balance or daylight what should it be for a shot like this…Continue

Started by Paul Chambers. Last reply by Mark Lawrence Sep 25, 2011.

Would you consider this as a silhoutte

Continue

Started by Paul Chambers Aug 5, 2011.

All gone quiet on here 2 Replies

All gone quiet on here I manage to get a free website for a year any comment would be appreciated. http://paulschambers.foliopic.com/ Regard PaulContinue

Started by Paul Chambers. Last reply by Paul Chambers Jul 17, 2011.

View All

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Photocritique to add comments!

Comment by Sam on November 18, 2011 at 2:56am: ChanceEye.jpg

Hey Guys!!

How you doing, just wondering if I could get some honest opinion on my image? Every one seems to say to my face 'Oh wow!!' but I want to know if thats what they are really thinking!! (Please excuse my Sam Beck Photography bit on it - I just copied it the image from my website!!)

Comment by Mark Lawrence on May 23, 2011 at 9:03pm: The purpose of this group was to give feedback to people's images. Maybe another way to look at this Frank is a request for help and what kind of help the photographer needs.

Comment by joseph.paulsen on May 23, 2011 at 6:03am: This was taken with a slow shutter speed to capture a wide depth of field. The cat, however, had other ideas. I think the results are better than what I was expecting. The cat looks as if it's a ghost. Let me know if the blur effect looks good or interesting, and if there are any other critiques on the pic.

Comment by Frank Meaney on May 22, 2011 at 9:23am: Hello All,

May I dare to make a suggestion that a clear set of points are required to critique correctly. These should be set out clearly before any comment is made.

This group seems to have 2 different areas, people who just want general opinions and help and NOT critique in the true sense.

And those that want to offer critique without the guidelines or criteria required, in my experience True critique needs a fix committee of respected members to work correctly.

Hope this helps, otherwise this could turn into members having to explain all to everyone.

Comment by Rafal Ukleja on May 22, 2011 at 3:25am: hi i wood love to hear what you guys think about my new model&HDR creation

Comment by Guus Quaedvlieg on May 3, 2011 at 11:36pm: Hi Tom,

I'll do my best... ;-)

Comment by Guus Quaedvlieg on May 3, 2011 at 10:22pm: Hi Tom,

I agree with you. You like a picture or you don't.
It would be more interesting to give comment on technical matter, so you can improve your pictures the next time you take it.
So, I think that the comment, and the photographer does not have to ask for it, should always be a statement to improve your picture technicaly.. p.e. give some examples for settings by a night shot, or give some remarks on the position of the photographer to the sun when it's a bright day, or crop some part of the picture to lead the attention to the main part, and so on...
Comment such as nice, or good shot doesn't have any value. So when you don'have to add anything valueable you better keep quiet...

regards!

Comment by Mark Lawrence on April 20, 2011 at 7:46pm: A note to everyone. Many times we present photos and want opinions. If you would be so kind as to give people as many details as possible so that the audience can arrive at a more accurate review. Please also give the type of photo that you are doing so that people can give the best their best opinions possible.

Comment by Mark Lawrence on April 4, 2011 at 6:40am: I added the watermark issue to the site because this was an article on a conference in Mexico that talked about the safety of Watermarks. I hope this is helpful.

Comment by Mark Lawrence on March 23, 2011 at 11:17am: One of the things that hurt photographing in Mexican was the commercial that Nike shot at Chichen Itza pyramid of a runner bounding up the pyramid. The Mexican government wanted money for the shots and Nike said they weren't about to pay anything so now they don't allow tripods, professional cameras, and if you do video there is a fee. FYI